War · Shanghai Composite Index (2022)
Replay 144 days of the Shanghai Composite from 3568.14 to 3146.57 as a 21.6% drawdown reshaped sentiment. Step through each session, confront 25 decision points including 9 critical ones, and receive AI coach feedback on a simulated training ground.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2021-10 to 2022-05 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 214 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 21.6% and a 9.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −21.6%
- Max run-up
- +9.0%
- Duration
- 214 days
- Largest single-day move
- −5.1%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Pandemic · Shanghai Composite Index (2022)2021 · Lv.2
- Bubble · Shanghai Composite Index (2021)2021 · Lv.1
- Policy · Shanghai Composite Index (2022)2021 · Lv.2
- Policy · Shanghai Composite Index (2022)2021 · Lv.2
- Crisis · Shanghai Composite Index (2022)2021 · Lv.2
- Default · Shanghai Composite Index (2022)2021 · Lv.3
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In the autumn of 2021 the Shanghai Composite held near 3568.14, riding a bull run that had defined the early 2020s market. Yet beneath the surface calm, geopolitical tensions were escalating. When Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, global risk appetite shifted violently. The stage was set for a stress test of extraordinary proportions across 144 trading days.
The index closed at 3146.57 by May 2022, a retreat of -11.8% from the October start. The damage ran far deeper than the headline number: a maximum drawdown of 21.6% wiped out months of gains in a matter of weeks. The largest single session swung 5.1%, testing the nerves of every participant in the market. Twenty-five decision points peppered this decline, nine of them critical moments where positioning and risk management made the difference between severe loss and relative preservation of capital.
Trading through this episode reveals why process matters more than prediction. Geopolitical shocks arrive without warning, and no indicator reliably times their onset or resolution. The value of this replay lies in confronting 9 critical junctures under simulated pressure, learning to size positions, manage drawdowns, and control emotional responses before real capital is at stake. Historical accuracy grounds the lesson; the coach's feedback sharpens it.