S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2018-12-24 to 2019-02-20)
Replay a 78-trading-day S&P 600 SmallCap stretch that climbed just 1.2% yet endured an 18.4% drawdown. Move bar-by-bar through 11 decision points, weigh each branch, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
78 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2018-11 to 2019-03 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 116 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 18.4% and a 24.6% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −18.4%
- Max run-up
- +24.6%
- Duration
- 116 days
- Largest single-day move
- +4.7%
- Bars
- 78 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2018-04-02 to 2018-08-31)2018 · Lv.2
- S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2020-10-28 to 2021-03-12)2020 · Lv.4
- S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2016-11-03 to 2017-02-21)2016 · Lv.2
- S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2016-02-11 to 2016-04-27)2016 · Lv.2
- S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2020-05-13 to 2020-06-08)2020 · Lv.4
- S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2023-10-27 to 2023-12-27)2023 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The S&P 600 SmallCap index entered late 2018 as volatility dominated equity markets, creating a particularly demanding environment for participants focused on domestic small-cap equities. This replay window captures a period defined by sharp reversals and persistent uncertainty, where the traditional risk-on narrative proved far messier than headlines suggested. For those training decision-making processes, the stakes centered on maintaining discipline through outsized moves while avoiding the psychological traps that accompany sudden drawdowns.
The 78-trading-day span shows a market that ultimately delivered negligible returns: 77.08 to 78.01, a mere 1.2% gain. Yet this masks an 18.4% maximum drawdown along the way, with the largest single session moving 4.7%. Participants faced 11 decision points, including 4 critical junctures where directional conviction mattered most. The environment was unmistakably a boom phase, but one defined more by violent mean-reversion than sustained momentum.
This scenario teaches that survival during noisy uptrends requires robust position sizing and emotional detachment from interim losses. The 18.4% drawdown represents the kind of adversity that separates disciplined participants from those who exit at the worst moment. Training here focuses on recognizing when volatility is noise versus signal, managing risk at each of the 11 branching points, and maintaining composure when a 4.7% single-day move threatens portfolio stability. The lesson: mediocre end results can coexist with extraordinary intermediate turbulence.