S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2016-02-11 to 2016-04-27)
Replay the S&P 600 SmallCap uptrend from January to June 2016, featuring an 8.4% close gain across 106 daily bars. Step through the market day by day, make choices at 11 decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated trading decisions.
106 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2016-01 to 2016-06 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 151 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 10.5% and a 21.4% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −10.5%
- Max run-up
- +21.4%
- Duration
- 151 days
- Largest single-day move
- +3.2%
- Bars
- 106 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2016-11-03 to 2017-02-21)2016 · Lv.2
- S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2018-12-24 to 2019-02-20)2018 · Lv.1
- S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2018-04-02 to 2018-08-31)2018 · Lv.2
- S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2013-04-18 to 2014-01-22)2013 · Lv.3
- S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2020-10-28 to 2021-03-12)2020 · Lv.4
- S&P 600 SmallCap Uptrend Replay (2012-11-15 to 2013-03-15)2012 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The S&P 600 SmallCap index entered 2016 amid mixed signals for small-cap stocks, a segment known for its sensitivity to domestic economic conditions. The period from January through early June presented traders with a genuine boom environment, where understanding when to build positions and when to protect gains became the central challenge. Eleven decision points were embedded across 106 daily bars, with four identified as critical junctures where direction could have shifted significantly.
The market closed the data span at 58.28 versus an opening of 53.77, delivering an 8.4% gain across the six-month window. This outcome was tempered by a maximum drawdown of 10.5% and occasional sharp single-day moves reaching 3.2%, creating moments of genuine stress. Such volatility within an overall uptrend tested discipline and forced real-time choices about entry timing, position sizing, and risk management under pressure.
The scenario's value lies not in predicting outcomes but in exposing the psychological tensions inherent in trending markets. Navigating a 10.5% pullback while an 8.4% gain sits within reach requires emotional control and adherence to a defined process—precisely the competencies that separate disciplined traders from reactive ones. Small-cap environments amplify these pressures due to their higher volatility profiles, making this replay an effective training ground for handling boom conditions without overcommitting during inevitable reversals.