Cotton Historical Replay: 2016-11 to 2017-05
Replay 124 daily bars of the 2016–17 cotton boom, watching the close climb 20.7% from 70.69 to 85.32. Step through each session, face 21 decision points including 7 critical ones, and receive AI coach feedback on your choices in this simulated training exercise.
124 daily bars · 21 decision points · 2016-11 to 2017-05 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 181 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 6.3% and a 23.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −6.3%
- Max run-up
- +23.0%
- Duration
- 181 days
- Largest single-day move
- +3.8%
- Bars
- 124 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 21
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Cocoa Historical Replay: 2016-11 to 2017-052016 · Lv.3
- Coffee Historical Replay: 2016-11 to 2017-052016 · Lv.3
- Orange Juice Historical Replay: 2016-11 to 2017-052016 · Lv.4
- Sugar Historical Replay: 2016-11 to 2017-052016 · Lv.4
- Orange Juice Historical Replay: 2015-11 to 2016-052015 · Lv.3
- Cotton Historical Replay: 2016-11 to 2017-022016 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The cotton market entered November 2016 at a delicate juncture. A soft commodity tied to global demand signals, weather patterns, and currency dynamics, cotton had spent months consolidating after a prolonged sideways grind. As the 2016–17 season opened, participants faced a classic question: would supply adjustments and improving consumption data finally break the market from its equilibrium, or would headwinds keep prices range-bound? With 21 decision points embedded across 124 daily bars, the replay simulates a trader navigating this uncertainty from mid-November through mid-May, confronting both routine entries and 7 critical junctures that demanded clear risk reasoning under incomplete information.
The close climbed from 70.69 to 85.32 over the 124-session window, a 20.7% advance that reflected a sustained uptrend rather than a single explosive move. Yet the journey was far from linear — a maximum drawdown of 6.3% tested conviction at least once, and the largest single-bar move of 3.8% reminded participants that momentum can surprise even within a trending environment. Volatility of this magnitude separates a methodical trend follower from a reactive trader, and every session presented an opportunity to either build or erode position management discipline.
This replay is a laboratory for process over prediction. No one could have known the exact timing or magnitude of the advance, but every trader could have had a clear system for sizing risk, respecting drawdown thresholds, and deciding whether a 3.8% single-session swing warranted adaptation or patience. Facing 7 critical decision points forces you out of analysis paralysis and into real calibration of your psychological thresholds. The 20.7% gain is the outcome; the training value lies in how you methodically earned or lost the right to stay positioned as the market unfolded.