Platinum Historical Replay: 2013-11 to 2014-05
Replay 122 trading days of platinum from November 2013 to May 2014, when prices drifted just 1.2% despite an 8.3% drawdown. Make decisions at 21 checkpoints, then review your reasoning with an AI coach in this simulated educational environment.
122 daily bars · 21 decision points · 2013-11 to 2014-05 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 179 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 8.3% and a 12.8% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −8.3%
- Max run-up
- +12.8%
- Duration
- 179 days
- Largest single-day move
- −2.4%
- Bars
- 122 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 21
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Platinum futures entered the final quarter of 2013 with the precious metals complex under pressure from a strengthening US dollar. The scenario spans 122 trading days from mid-November 2013 to mid-May 2014, placing participants in the 2010s commodity environment where monetary policy divergence was reshaping global markets. With 21 decision points including 7 critical junctures, the replay challenges traders to navigate an extended period of range-bound price action while managing directional exposure in a volatile underlying.
The outcome tells a story of deceptive calm: platinum settled at 1454.7 from an opening 1437.1, a mere 1.2% net gain over the entire five-month window. Yet this sedate headline number obscured an 8.3% peak-to-trough drawdown and intraday swings reaching 2.4% on the most volatile single session. A trader fixated on directional bias would have endured significant unrealized losses before the market ultimately delivered virtually no trend to exploit.
The scenario's greatest value lies in confronting participants with the psychological strain of a market that moves without progressing. Maintaining discipline through 8.3% drawdowns while prices meander demands robust risk protocols and emotional regulation. The critical decision points force learners to distinguish between fundamental conviction and mere price noise, building the judgment required to survive extended periods of low conviction where false breakouts frequently reverse.
Featured in the archive