Canada National (BIS) Historical Replay: 2012-07 to 2019-10
Replay 30 months of Canadian property data from 2012-07 to 2019-10, tracking a 62.2% rise across six decision points. Step through each monthly bar, face two critical choices, and receive an AI coach review, all within a simulated educational environment.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2012-07 to 2019-10 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 1.2% with a 64.3% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −1.2%
- Max run-up
- +64.3%
- Largest single-month move
- +6.7%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Canadian property market replay spans 30 months from 2012-07 to 2019-10, capturing a period of significant regulatory intervention in major urban centers. Participants track monthly national data as policy discussions around foreign buyer taxes intensify in Vancouver and Toronto. This educational scenario places users at the center of a market cycle shaped by government intervention, testing their ability to interpret policy signals and manage positions through uncertainty.
Over the 30-month period, the market rose from 110.94 to 179.99, delivering a 62.2% return while experiencing remarkably contained volatility. The maximum drawdown of just 1.2% and the largest single monthly move of 6.7% suggest a sustained uptrend with limited panic-driven selling. Throughout the replay, participants navigate six decision points, with two critical junctures demanding decisive action under uncertainty.
This scenario sharpens decision training by revealing how regulatory news tests conviction. The stark contrast between the 6.7% peak monthly swing and the minimal overall drawdown demonstrates how investor psychology can distort risk perception during extended market movements. Users learn to separate noise from signal, respecting position sizing principles even when headlines suggest dramatic change. The replay ultimately teaches that disciplined process, not reactive emotion, defines resilience through policy-driven volatility.