Canada National (BIS) Historical Replay: 1995-04 to 2002-07
Relive the 1996-01 recovery beat of Canada's national property market, where prices climbed 26.2% from 1995 to 2002. Replay each month step by step, navigate 6 decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 1995-04 to 2002-07 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 3.9% with a 27.4% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −3.9%
- Max run-up
- +27.4%
- Largest single-month move
- +4.4%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Canada's national property market entered a recovery phase in 1995, with data spanning from April 1995 through July 2002. This period covered both the 1990s and 2000s, capturing a significant chapter in the nation's real estate history. As prices began climbing from recessionary lows, investors faced the challenge of identifying sustainable trends while managing uncertainty during an economic turnaround.
Over the seven-year span comprising 30 monthly bars, the market delivered a net advance of 26.2%, with prices rising from 44.96 to 56.74. Despite the positive trajectory, the journey was not linear. The maximum drawdown reached 3.9%, while the largest single-bar move hit 4.4%, illustrating that even during a recovery, price action contained moments of tension and reversal.
This scenario presents six decision points, two of which are marked as critical, demanding participants navigate periods of indecision and volatility. The replay trains users to avoid reacting to short-term fluctuations and instead focus on process: sizing positions appropriately, respecting drawdown limits, and maintaining conviction when fundamentals support the trend. The psychological discipline required here—staying objective during the 3.9% pullbacks—distinguishes disciplined participants from those who exit prematurely.
Featured in the archive