MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2022-06-16 to 2022-08-16)
Replay 84 daily bars of the MSCI World from May to September 2022, watching a -3.4% close against a 12.7% drawdown. Walk through 11 decision points day by day, including 4 critical ones, and receive an AI coach review on your simulated choices.
84 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2022-05 to 2022-09 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 121 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 12.7% and a 14.7% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −12.7%
- Max run-up
- +14.7%
- Duration
- 121 days
- Largest single-day move
- −4.1%
- Bars
- 84 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2022-10-12 to 2022-12-01)2022 · Lv.2
- MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2022-12-28 to 2023-02-02)2022 · Lv.1
- MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2023-03-13 to 2023-07-31)2023 · Lv.2
- MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2021-10-04 to 2021-11-08)2021 · Lv.1
- MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2024-08-05 to 2024-12-06)2024 · Lv.2
- MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2024-04-19 to 2024-07-16)2024 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The MSCI World index enters this replay spanning 84 daily bars from mid-May to mid-September 2022. Global equities navigated a treacherous landscape during these months—rising interest rates, stubborn inflation, and geopolitical tensions created an environment where directional conviction was constantly tested. Participants face 11 decision points across the period, with 4 flagged as critical junctures where positioning choices carried heightened consequence. The scenario immerses traders in authentic market rhythms, demanding they read conditions and act without the safety net of hindsight.
The numbers reveal a market that defied easy categorization. The index closed at 109.97 from an opening of 113.82, producing a modest -3.4% net decline over the period. Yet this benign headline figure conceals considerably more turbulence beneath the surface—a maximum drawdown of 12.7% tested risk tolerance repeatedly, while the largest single-bar move of 4.1% demonstrated that directional shifts could arrive with little warning. A participant who entered the period expecting clear trending conditions would have found the reality far messier.
This replay exposes the gap between outcome and process that defines real market participation. Even disciplined decision-makers would have weathered a double-digit drawdown within an overall flat performance window. The psychological challenge of maintaining conviction through such volatility—knowing when to adjust, when to hold, and when to question the original thesis—remains one of the hardest skills to develop. The scenario teaches that surviving periods of drawdown without abandoning sound process is itself a form of expertise worth cultivating.