MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2020-04-01 to 2020-06-08)
Replay 94 days of MSCI World trading from February 27 to July 10, 2020, navigating a 28.8% drawdown and an 11.4% single-day surge. You make decisions at 11 points with AI coach feedback in a simulated educational training environment.
94 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2020-02 to 2020-07 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 134 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 28.8% and a 43.8% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −28.8%
- Max run-up
- +43.8%
- Duration
- 134 days
- Largest single-day move
- −11.4%
- Bars
- 94 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2020-10-30 to 2021-09-03)2020 · Lv.3
- MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2018-12-24 to 2019-05-03)2018 · Lv.1
- MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2023-10-27 to 2024-03-27)2023 · Lv.3
- MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2016-11-04 to 2018-01-26)2017 · Lv.2
- MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2025-04-08 to 2025-10-28)2025 · Lv.3
- MSCI World Uptrend Replay (2026-03-30 to 2026-08-13)2026 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The MSCI World index in early 2020 presented one of the most demanding trading environments in recent memory. From February 27 to July 10, 2020—spanning 94 daily bars—investors faced an unprecedented global health crisis that shattered market assumptions. This replay captures the full arc of that turbulence, from the initial shock through tentative recovery, demanding that participants navigate extreme uncertainty with limited information.
The data tells a story of dramatic recovery: the index closed at 90.97 on February 27 and finished at 94.93 on July 10, a modest 4.4% gain over the full period. Yet this headline number obscures the severity of the intervening journey—a maximum drawdown of 28.8% tested every trader's conviction, while an 11.4% single-day surge demonstrated how quickly sentiment could reverse. The gap between starting and ending prices barely hints at the emotional and tactical strain embedded in between.
This scenario trains decision-makers across three essential dimensions. First, process discipline: navigating 11 decision points, 4 of them critical, demands consistent application of rules regardless of outcome sequence. Second, risk calibration: tolerating a 28.8% drawdown without abandoning a sound strategy requires position sizing and psychological reserves. Third, emotional regulation: the whiplash between catastrophic drops and explosive rallies tests whether participants can maintain long-term perspective. The ultimate lesson is that surviving volatility is not about predicting each move—it is about building a framework resilient enough to endure the unendurable while capturing the recovery that eventually arrives.