KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2023-03-14 to 2023-07-14)
Replay 150 daily bars of the KOSPI 200 from January to September 2023, when the index climbed 4.9% from 32100 to 33675 amid a 7.0% drawdown. Step through each session, tackle 11 decision points, and receive an AI coach review on your simulated choices.
150 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2023-01 to 2023-09 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 240 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 7.0% and a 12.6% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −7.0%
- Max run-up
- +12.6%
- Duration
- 240 days
- Largest single-day move
- +4.9%
- Bars
- 150 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2024-01-17 to 2024-04-02)2023 · Lv.2
- KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2023-10-31 to 2024-01-02)2023 · Lv.1
- KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2024-12-09 to 2025-02-19)2024 · Lv.2
- KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2021-03-10 to 2021-04-20)2021 · Lv.1
- KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2023-01-02 to 2023-01-27)2022 · Lv.2
- KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2020-08-20 to 2020-09-15)2020 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Between January and September 2023, the KOSPI 200 presented traders with a classic test of discipline during a gradual uptrend. The index moved from 32100 to 33675 over 150 trading sessions, a modest 4.9% gain that masked significant intraperiod turbulence. With a maximum drawdown of 7.0% and a largest single-day swing of 4.9%, the market demanded constant recalibration of expectations and risk parameters.
The period rewarded neither aggressive chasing nor excessive caution. Eleven decision points, four deemed critical, punctuated the journey, each testing whether participants could distinguish temporary disruption from structural change. Those who treated every pullback as a potential reversal likely exited prematurely; those who ignored deteriorating momentum may have watched gains evaporate. The narrow net return emphasized that direction alone is insufficient without process.
For decision training, this replay illuminates how psychological noise distorts risk perception during extended trends. The 7.0% drawdown felt catastrophic in isolation yet proved temporary within the broader advance. Traders learn to audit their reasoning: Was the exit based on deteriorating evidence or emotional discomfort? Position sizing and predefined thresholds become the guardrails that prevent a 4.9% single-bar spike from becoming a reckless overextension. Historical context transforms market noise into educational signal.