Rough Rice Historical Replay: 2010-08 to 2010-11
Replay 64 daily bars of rough rice from 2010-08-23 to 2010-11-19 as the Russian wheat ban rippled through global grains. Step through each session, face 11 decision points including 4 critical ones, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
64 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2010-08 to 2010-11 · Commodities
Key facts
This window spans 88 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 11.7% and a 35.4% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −11.7%
- Max run-up
- +35.4%
- Duration
- 88 days
- Largest single-day move
- −3.6%
- Bars
- 64 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Rough rice traded daily during the late summer and fall of 2010, when the global grains market faced a geopolitical shock: Russia announced a wheat export ban. The decision window spanned from 2010-08-23 to 2010-11-19, covering 64 daily bars and touching multiple decision points as traders absorbed the ripple effects across agricultural commodities.
The price rose from 11.35 to 13.9, a gain of 22.5%, but the path was turbulent. The market experienced a maximum drawdown of 11.7% and endured its largest single-bar move of 3.6% as headlines shifted sentiment rapidly. Navigating this volatility meant facing 11 decision points, 4 of which were critical junctures where directional conviction was tested.
This replay sharpens the discipline of managing risk through sharp reversals. Traders must confront the psychological difficulty of holding positions when headlines trigger sudden swings. The training value lies in applying a consistent process for sizing, entry, and exit rather than reacting to noise, building the composure needed to act decisively at critical nodes without abandoning sound risk management.
Featured in the archive