GBP/CHF Historical Replay: 2023-03 to 2023-06
Replay GBP/CHF across 68 daily bars spanning the 2023 banking crisis, from 1.1262 to 1.1407. Step through each session, confront 4 critical decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated trades.
68 daily bars · 12 decision points · 2023-03 to 2023-06 · Forex
Key facts
This window spans 92 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 2.4% and a 3.7% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −2.4%
- Max run-up
- +3.7%
- Duration
- 92 days
- Largest single-day move
- +1.0%
- Bars
- 68 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 12
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In the spring of 2023, the foreign-exchange market faced a sharp confidence test when the collapses of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse rattled global financial stability. The GBP/CHF pair, combining two G10 currencies with distinct safe-haven and risk-sensitive characteristics, offers a concentrated lens on this turbulence. This replay spans 68 daily bars from late March through mid-June, placing traders inside a period where conventional correlations broke down and central-bank signaling created sudden inflection points. Participants must navigate not just price action but the psychological weight of systemic uncertainty.
Over the full data span, GBP/CHF closed the period at 1.1407, rising 1.3% from an opening level of 1.1262. Beneath this modest net move lay meaningful turbulence: a maximum drawdown of 2.4% tested positions at various points, while the largest single-bar move of 1.0% underscored how quickly sentiment could shift. Across 68 sessions, traders encountered 12 decision points, of which 4 were deemed critical—moments where the crisis narrative intersected with technical levels, forcing choices about position sizing, hedging, or standing aside.
This scenario trains the discipline of process over prediction. The gap between a 2.4% drawdown and a 1.3% net gain reminds us that survival during a crisis often depends on sizing discipline and emotional calibration rather than directional conviction. Facing 4 critical nodes without the benefit of hindsight sharpens pattern recognition and reinforces the habit of reviewing every simulated trade with an AI coach, turning each session into a structured lesson in risk management and psychological resilience.
Featured in the archive