FTSE MIB Downtrend Replay (2024-05-16 to 2024-06-14)
Replay a 7.8% maximum drawdown across the Italian FTSE MIB from April 29 to June 28, 2024, in a market-replay scenario. Walk through each daily bar, face three critical decision points, and receive an AI coach review—simulated capital, purely educational.
44 daily bars · 8 decision points · 2024-04 to 2024-06 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 60 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 7.8% and a 5.3% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −7.8%
- Max run-up
- +5.3%
- Duration
- 60 days
- Largest single-day move
- −2.8%
- Bars
- 44 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 8
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- FTSE MIB Downtrend Replay (2023-09-20 to 2023-10-27)2023 · Lv.1
- FTSE MIB Downtrend Replay (2020-08-12 to 2020-09-25)2020 · Lv.1
- Dow Jones Ind. Downtrend Replay (2025-01-30 to 2025-04-08)2024 · Lv.1
- Russell 2000 Downtrend Replay (2025-01-21 to 2025-03-13)2024 · Lv.4
- S&P 600 SmallCap Downtrend Replay (2025-01-21 to 2025-03-13)2024 · Lv.3
- S&P 400 MidCap Downtrend Replay (2025-01-21 to 2025-03-13)2024 · Lv.3
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Italian FTSE MIB enters this replay at the intersection of an established uptrend and a mounting correction pressure. Over 44 daily bars spanning April 29 to June 28, 2024, the scenario places you inside a market confronting shifting sentiment across the 2020s decade. With eight decision points—three flagged as critical—you must navigate the tension between trend-following discipline and the humility required when a drawdown accelerates beyond comfort. Simulated capital ensures this remains an educational exercise, not a financial test.
The closing level retreated from 34296 to 33154, translating to a -3.3% net decline. Yet the story runs deeper: the maximum drawdown touched 7.8%, meaning peak-to-trough losses substantially outpaced the final outcome. The largest single trading day swung 2.8%, illustrating how a few volatile sessions can distort perspective and pressure decision-making. These numbers define the arena—you are not simply watching a decline, you are living through its erratic rhythm.
For decision training, the primary lesson is calibrating risk tolerance against market reality. A 7.8% drawdown is uncomfortable but survivable; the question is whether your process holds under that pressure. The critical decision points force you to choose between conviction and flexibility—sticking with positions or cutting them. By replaying with simulated funds, you practice the psychology of loss without financial consequence, building the discipline needed when real capital is at stake.