USD/TND Historical Replay: 2024-11 to 2025-05
Replay 128 daily bars from 2024-11-15 to 2025-05-15 as the USD/TND pair slipped 4.3%. You step through each session, navigate 22 decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your choices in a simulated market environment.
128 daily bars · 22 decision points · 2024-11 to 2025-05 · Forex
Key facts
This window spans 181 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 8.3% and a 3.4% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −8.3%
- Max run-up
- +3.4%
- Duration
- 181 days
- Largest single-day move
- −1.8%
- Bars
- 128 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 22
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- USD/ALL Historical Replay: 2024-07 to 2025-012024 · Lv.2
- USD/ARS Historical Replay: 2024-07 to 2025-012024 · Lv.2
- USD/BRL Historical Replay: 2024-07 to 2025-012024 · Lv.2
- USD/CLP Historical Replay: 2024-07 to 2025-012024 · Lv.2
- USD/COP Historical Replay: 2024-07 to 2025-012024 · Lv.2
- USD/CZK Historical Replay: 2024-07 to 2025-012024 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The USD/TND pair entered a six-month historical window from November 2024 through May 2025, placing traders in one of the more demanding emerging-market currency environments of the 2020s. This was a period where the Tunisian dinar faced sustained depreciation pressure against the dollar across 128 daily bars, demanding careful analysis of macro drivers and central bank policy signals. The stakes were clear: navigate a high-volatility EM currency or face significant mark-to-market losses.
The pair closed the period at 3.013 from an opening of 3.147, translating to a 4.3% decline. Yet the headline number understates the turbulence beneath: a maximum drawdown of 8.3% tested risk management discipline at multiple points, while the largest single-bar move of 1.8% demanded composure during sudden volatility spikes. Twenty-two decision points punctuated this period, with eight critical moments where directional conviction was essential. The challenge was not merely calling the depreciation, but surviving its irregular rhythm.
For decision training, this replay exposes the gap between knowing a currency is weakening and executing that view under psychological strain. Participants must practice sizing positions against an 8.3% drawdown scenario, drilling the discipline to hold or adjust when individual bars exceed expected ranges. The eight critical junctures serve as pressure points where emotional regulation separates disciplined execution from reactive panic. This is the core lesson: process consistency underpins every successful EM currency approach.