USD/MAD Historical Replay: 2018-07 to 2018-10
Replay the 2018-07 to 2018-10 USD/MAD window across 64 daily bars as emerging-market crisis volatility gripped currencies. You make 11 decision points through simulated capital and receive an AI coach review of each call.
64 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2018-07 to 2018-10 · Forex
Key facts
This window spans 87 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 4.8% and a 4.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −4.8%
- Max run-up
- +4.1%
- Duration
- 87 days
- Largest single-day move
- −2.9%
- Bars
- 64 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- USD/ALL Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.1
- USD/BRL Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.2
- USD/CLP Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.2
- USD/COP Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.1
- USD/CZK Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.1
- USD/DOP Historical Replay: 2019-07 to 2020-012019 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In the summer of 2018, emerging market currencies faced severe pressure as the Turkey-Argentina crisis rippled across the globe. This replay captures the USD/MAD market across 64 daily bars from July 9 to October 4, placing traders in the middle of an era defined by contagion risk and policy uncertainty. Morocco's dirham, while less volatile than some peers, was not immune to the shifting sentiment that swept through developing economies during this period. The scenario tests participants' ability to navigate an environment where safe-haven flows and risk-off positioning dominated intraday dynamics.
The data reveals a nuanced outcome: the closing rate shifted from 9.4047 to 9.4436, representing a modest 0.4% gain for dollar holders over the full window. Beneath that surface calm lay substantial turbulence—a maximum drawdown of 4.8% tested positions at their weakest, while the largest single-bar move of 2.9% demanded split-second judgment. Across the 11 decision points, four carried critical weight, forcing participants to choose between holding through volatility or adjusting exposure when the pressure mounted.
This replay sharpens the skills that separate disciplined traders from reactive ones. Participants learn to size positions knowing a 4.8% adverse swing could arrive without warning, and to build conviction frameworks that survive days when market consensus flips suddenly. The psychological dimension is equally demanding: staying anchored to process when a 2.9% intraday spike threatens to derail rational thinking. For anyone studying emerging-market FX, this window offers a compressed laboratory for testing how risk management holds up under contagion stress.
Featured in the archive