Policy · DAX Index (2023)
Replay 144 daily bars of DAX turbulence from 2022-11-15 to 2023-06-08, when policy headlines drove a 5.9% drawdown. Step through 25 decision points, weigh the policy shock, and receive an AI coach review—simulated capital, purely educational.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2022-11 to 2023-06 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 205 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 5.9% and a 17.2% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −5.9%
- Max run-up
- +17.2%
- Duration
- 205 days
- Largest single-day move
- −3.3%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Inflation · DAX Index (2022)2022 · Lv.3
- Regulation · DAX Index (2023)2022 · Lv.2
- Crisis · DAX Index (2023)2022 · Lv.2
- Default · DAX Index (2023)2022 · Lv.3
- Crisis · DAX Index (2022)2022 · Lv.2
- Commodity Shock · DAX Index (2022)2022 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The German equity market navigated a treacherous policy landscape from 2022-11-15 to 2023-06-08, a 144-day window when regulatory headlines could move the DAX by several percentage points in a single session. Investors faced a minefield of uncertainty as policymakers wrestled with the aftermath of financial institution interventions, leaving market participants to decipher competing signals about economic direction. This period demanded constant recalibration of positioning as the boundary between policy expectation and market reality shifted daily.
The index climbed from 14378.51 to 15989.96, delivering an 11.2% return, yet this masked the underlying turbulence. A maximum drawdown of 5.9% tested conviction, while intraday swings of 3.3% made risk management a matter of survival rather than optimization. The path higher was littered with sharp reversals that stripped away confidence from all but the most disciplined participants.
This replay offers 25 decision points, with 9 classified as critical moments where outcomes diverged sharply. The educational value lies not in predicting policy shifts but in building resilient processes that accommodate surprise. Participants learn to weigh policy risk against reward, manage drawdowns without panic, and maintain psychological equilibrium when headlines contradict their positioning. These skills transfer directly to any market environment shaped by regulatory uncertainty.