US 10-City Composite Historical Replay: 2014-09 to 2017-02
Replay 30 monthly bars of the US 10-city property index from 2014-09 to 2017-02, charting a steady 12.5% rise to 209.57 with zero drawdown. You step through each historical decision point, explain your reasoning, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated judgment.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2014-09 to 2017-02 · Property
Key facts
- Max run-up
- +12.5%
- Largest single-month move
- +0.7%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The replay transports you to September 2014, when the US 10-city composite property index stood at 186.22. Over the next 30 months, through February 2017, you would navigate a market that was posting steady gains in the recovery boom phase of the 2010s real estate cycle. Six decision points await, two marked as critical junctures where your choices would carry heightened consequence.
What unfolds is a remarkably clean upward trajectory. The index climbs 12.5% to reach 209.57, with the largest single monthly move capped at just 0.7% and maximum drawdown holding at zero throughout the period. This was not a volatile spike but a sustained, grinding advance that rewarded patience and tested conviction at each monthly checkpoint.
For decision training, this scenario strips away the drama of crashes and crises to examine how investors behave during quiet prosperity. With no drawdown to panic over and moves too small to trade around, the real challenge becomes managing complacency, maintaining discipline, and resisting the temptation to underweight a steadily rising position. The 2010s recovery boom offers a masterclass in the psychological costs of being underinvested during the least exciting part of a market cycle.
Featured in the archive