Seattle Historical Replay: 2010-10 to 2013-03
Replay Seattle from October 2010 to March 2013 across 30 monthly bars of a 9.9% drawdown property market. You step through each month, face 6 decision points including 2 critical ones, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated capital choices.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2010-10 to 2013-03 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 9.9% with a 12.6% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −9.9%
- Max run-up
- +12.6%
- Largest single-month move
- +3.0%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Seattle's property market from October 2010 to March 2013 offers a distinctive replay environment spanning 30 monthly bars. This was a housing market still absorbing the aftershocks of the global financial crisis, navigating uncertainty while attempting to stabilize. You will encounter 6 decision points across this period, with 2 critical moments that could substantially reshape your simulated capital position. The task is to move through each month deliberately, applying your strategy while an AI coach evaluates the logic behind every move.
The market closed at 143.13 in October 2010 and finished at 145.2 by March 2013, a gain of just 1.4% over the full span. Yet this modest net result masked meaningful turbulence beneath the surface. The maximum drawdown reached 9.9%, meaning your portfolio could have been underwater by nearly that amount at the worst point. The largest single monthly move was 3.0%, a figure that underscores how even quiet months can deliver sharp intrabar or intermonth shocks in a fragile recovery environment.
This replay is less about forecasting direction than about stress-testing your process and emotional discipline. Navigating a 9.9% drawdown requires clear thresholds for risk acceptance and a consistent framework for position sizing. The psychology of enduring sequential losing periods while the market oscillates without clear trend is where many participants reveal gaps in their preparation. The two critical decision points become crucibles for examining whether your approach holds together when conviction is tested.