Phoenix Historical Replay: 2010-10 to 2013-03
Replay 30 monthly bars from October 2010 to March 2013, capturing a 22.9% rise amid a modest 5.4% drawdown. You step through historical market days, face six decision points, and receive an AI coach review on your simulated choices.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2010-10 to 2013-03 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 5.4% with a 30.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −5.4%
- Max run-up
- +30.0%
- Largest single-month move
- +2.7%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
This replay immerses you in Phoenix's residential property market from October 2010 to March 2013, a period of tentative recovery following the devastating housing collapse. Thirty monthly bars capture an economy still working through the aftermath of the global financial crisis, where every data release and policy shift carried weight for investors and homebuyers alike. The stakes were clear: distinguish genuine recovery signals from false dawns in a market defined by uncertainty.
The numbers tell a story of measured optimism. The market rose 22.9%, moving from 105.97 to 130.29 over the replay window, with a maximum drawdown of just 5.4%. The largest single monthly swing reached 2.7%, reflecting periods where sentiment could shift quickly. Six decision points punctuate this historical journey, two of them critical junctures where directional conviction mattered most.
Navigating this replay demands more than reading charts. You must calibrate position sizing against that 5.4% maximum drawdown, respecting the downside risk even while capturing the upward trend. The psychological test comes at critical moments when evidence remains ambiguous but commitment is required. How you manage conviction versus caution at those two pivotal decision points shapes your simulated performance and reveals habits worth examining.