Minneapolis Historical Replay: 2010-03 to 2012-08
Replay 30 monthly bars from March 2010 to August 2012, navigating a 16.6% max drawdown in Minneapolis property data. You will face 6 decision points across this crisis-era volatility and receive an AI coach review after each simulated step.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2010-03 to 2012-08 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 16.6% with a 17.8% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −16.6%
- Max run-up
- +17.8%
- Largest single-month move
- +4.7%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Minneapolis property market in the early 2010s was navigating the aftermath of the housing crisis, a period marked by uncertainty and volatility. This replay covers 30 monthly bars from March 2010 to August 2012, a time when investors faced a 16.6% max drawdown while the market attempted to stabilize. With 6 decision points, including 2 critical junctures, the scenario tests your ability to manage risk during a crisis-era recovery.
Over the two-year span, the market closed at 124.6, up 6.3% from the opening 117.24, yet the journey was far from smooth. The largest single-bar move of 4.7% underscores the intrabar volatility that could quickly erode or build positions. This modest overall gain, achieved amid significant fluctuations, illustrates how timing and risk management become paramount in choppy markets.
This replay emphasizes process over prediction. Facing a 16.6% drawdown, you must practice disciplined position sizing and emotional control. The two critical decision points serve as pressure tests, revealing how hesitation or overexposure can compound losses. By replaying this period, you train to stay objective, adhere to your strategy, and avoid reactive decisions that many real-world investors fell into during the crisis recovery.
Featured in the archive