Skip to main content

US 20-City Composite Historical Replay: 2010-03 to 2012-08

PropertyCity IndexUSCrisis2010-03 to 2012-08Difficulty 1/5FreeView charts

Replay 30 monthly bars of the US 20-city index from March 2010 to August 2012, a post-crisis stretch with a 9.9% drawdown and six decision points. You step through each bar, make calls at two critical junctures, and receive an AI coach review of your reasoning using simulated capital only.

30K lines
6Decision points
1Difficulty
monthlyGranularity

30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2010-03 to 2012-08 · Property

Key facts

Peak-to-trough drawdown of 9.9% with a 8.8% run-up.

Max drawdown
−9.9%
Max run-up
+8.8%
Largest single-month move
+2.4%
Bars
30 Monthly bars
Decision points
6

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

The US 20-city composite index entered March 2010 in the aftermath of the subprime mortgage crisis. Housing markets had cratered, foreclosures dominated headlines, and investors faced a fundamental question: had prices found a bottom, or was there further to fall? This 30-bar monthly replay spanning through August 2012 captures a crucial period—the first tentative steps of recovery amid persistent uncertainty, high unemployment, and lingering fears of a double-dip recession.

The data reveals a market searching for direction. From a closing level of 143.34 in March 2010, the index closed August 2012 at 145.82, representing a modest 1.7% gain over the full period. Yet this headline number masks considerable turbulence: the maximum drawdown reached 9.9%, and individual monthly bars saw moves as large as 2.4%. Six decision points were embedded throughout, with two marked as critical junctures where directional calls carried heightened consequence.

This replay sharpens several core competencies: calibrating risk tolerance against ambiguous environments, distinguishing between short-term price noise and genuine trend shifts, and recognizing that "flat" periods can be the most psychologically taxing. The 9.9% drawdown serves as a pressure test for position sizing, while the 2.4% single-bar volatility demands disciplined exits and entry discipline. Success hinges not on predicting exact bottoms, but on maintaining sound process when conviction is tested by market silence.