US 10-City Composite Historical Replay: 2003-07 to 2005-12
Replay the US 10-City index from July 2003 through December 2005 across 30 monthly bars, watching a 47.5% climb unfold. Make decisions at 6 checkpoints and receive an AI coach review of your choices in this simulated educational training scenario.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 2003-07 to 2005-12 · Property
Key facts
- Max run-up
- +47.5%
- Largest single-month move
- +1.9%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- US 20-City Composite Historical Replay: 2003-07 to 2005-122003 · Lv.3
- Seattle Historical Replay: 2003-07 to 2005-122003 · Lv.3
- New York Historical Replay: 2003-07 to 2005-122003 · Lv.3
- Minneapolis Historical Replay: 2003-07 to 2005-122003 · Lv.3
- Boston Historical Replay: 2003-07 to 2005-122003 · Lv.3
- San Francisco Historical Replay: 2003-07 to 2005-122003 · Lv.3
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The US 10-City Composite Index provides a window into one of American real estate's most celebrated runs. Spanning July 2003 through December 2005 across 30 monthly bars, this period saw a sustained ascent that would later become infamous as the peak before the crisis. Six decision points dot the timeline, two of them critical junctures where policy shifts and market dynamics demanded careful judgment. The era coincided with the Federal Reserve's pivot toward tightening, with the June 2004 rate hike looming as a pivotal moment.
What unfolded over those 30 months was remarkable: the index climbed from 150.65 to 222.18, delivering a 47.5% cumulative return with no drawdown to speak of. The largest single monthly advance measured just 1.9%, reflecting a market that rewarded patience and conviction. Zero percent maximum drawdown meant every investor who held through the period preserved capital perfectly, a statistic that would prove rare in the decades that followed.
This replay teaches that apparent stability can obscure fragility. The smooth climb from 150.65 to 222.18 encouraged confidence, yet the underlying architecture of leverage and speculation was building toward a different future. Six decision points trained decision-makers to act under uncertainty, while the June 2004 policy shift reminded them that even well-established trends can reverse when fundamentals shift. The lesson is not about predicting the top but about maintaining process discipline when prices rise steadily and complacency feels justified.
Featured in the archive