BEL 20 Uptrend Replay (2020-05-14 to 2020-06-05)
Replay the 2020 BEL 20 surge across 34 daily bars from 3099.12 to 3440.91, an 11.0% climb. Step through each session, navigate 7 decision points including 3 critical ones, and receive an AI coach review in this simulated, educational training environment.
34 daily bars · 7 decision points · 2020-04 to 2020-06 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 48 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 7.6% and a 22.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −7.6%
- Max run-up
- +22.1%
- Duration
- 48 days
- Largest single-day move
- +5.4%
- Bars
- 34 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 7
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Belgian equity benchmark entered May 2020 in a fragile recovery posture, with investors uncertain whether the post-pandemic rally had staying power. This replay spans 34 daily bars from April 30 to June 17, placing participants inside the BEL 20 as it navigated from 3099.12 to 3440.91 across a period that demanded constant reassessment of momentum and risk. The market backdrop featured lingering economic anxiety against early signs of corporate resilience, making every session a test of conviction versus caution.
What unfolded was an 11.0% advance punctuated by volatility. The index rose from 3099.12 to 3440.91, a climb that masked a 7.6% maximum drawdown and a 5.4% single-session surge that could have shaken weaker hands. Seven decision points were embedded in this trajectory, with three classified as critical—moments where positioning would define whether participants captured the upside or absorbed unnecessary risk. The path was neither smooth nor straight, demanding disciplined entry and exit calibration.
For decision training, this scenario exposes the psychological tension between trend-following and drawdown management. Participants must learn to size positions appropriately when volatility spikes, distinguish between healthy pullbacks and structural breakdowns, and maintain emotional equilibrium when a 5.4% single-bar move tests resolve. The critical decision points serve as pressure valves, forcing explicit choices about conviction, capital allocation, and risk tolerance—skills that transfer far beyond this specific historical window.