Bubble · S&P 500 Index (2000)
Replay the final stretch of the dot-com era across 142 daily bars from October 1999 to May 2000. Make your own calls at 25 decision points, including 9 critical moments, and receive an AI coach review of each decision in simulated capital only.
142 daily bars · 25 decision points · 1999-10 to 2000-05 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 204 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 11.2% and a 19.2% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −11.2%
- Max run-up
- +19.2%
- Duration
- 204 days
- Largest single-day move
- −5.8%
- Bars
- 142 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Regulation · S&P 500 Index (2000)1999 · Lv.1
- Crisis · S&P 500 Index (1998)1998 · Lv.1
- Default · S&P 500 Index (1998)1998 · Lv.1
- Default · S&P 500 Index (2001)2001 · Lv.2
- War · S&P 500 Index (2001)2001 · Lv.2
- Crash · S&P 500 Index (1997)1997 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The S&P 500 entered the final chapter of the dot-com era with technology stocks commanding extraordinary valuations and traditional metrics stretched to historic extremes. Between October 1999 and May 2000, this 142-day replay captures a market that had already surged dramatically but faced mounting questions about sustainability. Twenty-five decision points—nine deemed critical—force participants to navigate a period where momentum and mania coexisted with emerging skepticism.
The index moved from 1281.91 to 1447.8, representing a 12.9% gain over the data span. However, this aggregate gain obscures significant turbulence: a maximum drawdown of 11.2% tested conviction, while the largest single-day swing of 5.8% demonstrated how quickly sentiment could reverse. The period straddled the turn of the decade, covering both the late 1990s boom and the opening months of what would prove to be a transformative—though not yet evident—2000.
This replay trains participants to recognize that during bubble phases, the distinction between skill and fortunate timing blurs dangerously. Managing risk during an 11.2% drawdown requires discipline distinct from ordinary trend-following. The nine critical decision points are designed to expose psychological vulnerabilities: the tendency to overstay positions, to confuse correlation with conviction, and to underestimate tail risks that feel remote until they materialize. Success in this environment demands adherence to process over outcome, making the AI coach's retrospective analysis as valuable as the trading decisions themselves.