S&P 400 MidCap Downtrend Replay (1981-08-13 to 1981-09-25)
Replay a 62-day stretch where the S&P 400 MidCap fell 6.4% from 38.4 to 35.94. Walk through each session, face 11 decision points with 4 critical ones, and get an AI coach review of your simulated calls.
62 daily bars · 11 decision points · 1981-07 to 1981-10 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 86 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 16.2% and a 9.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −16.2%
- Max run-up
- +9.1%
- Duration
- 86 days
- Largest single-day move
- −2.8%
- Bars
- 62 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- S&P 400 MidCap Downtrend Replay (1981-11-30 to 1982-03-17)1981 · Lv.1
- S&P 400 MidCap Downtrend Replay (1982-05-12 to 1982-08-12)1982 · Lv.2
- S&P 400 MidCap Downtrend Replay (1983-09-26 to 1984-07-24)1983 · Lv.2
- S&P 400 MidCap Downtrend Replay (1983-06-24 to 1983-08-08)1983 · Lv.1
- S&P 400 MidCap Downtrend Replay (1985-07-17 to 1985-10-08)1985 · Lv.2
- S&P 400 MidCap Downtrend Replay (1986-07-03 to 1986-08-06)1986 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The S&P 400 MidCap in the summer of 1981 occupied a market landscape shadowed by persistent inflation, recession anxieties, and Federal Reserve tightening. For participants replaying this stretch, the environment offered no clear refuge—growth stocks struggled as rates climbed, and mid-cap names faced amplified sensitivity to shifting sentiment. This 62-day historical window presents 11 decision points, with 4 designated as critical junctures where directional calls carry heightened consequence. The educational stakes center on developing disciplined responses to deteriorating price action without the benefit of hindsight.
The index closed this period at 35.94, down from an opening level of 38.4—a total decline of 6.4%. Yet the max drawdown of 16.2% tells a harsher story: anyone holding through the deepest pullback endured losses more than double the final settlement. The largest single-bar move reached 2.8%, underscoring that corrections unfold unevenly, with sudden acceleration that can test conviction. Between July 22 and October 16, 1981, the market offered no straight-line descent but rather a jagged descent demanding continuous reassessment of risk exposure.
This replay sharpens three competencies central to market survival. First, drawdown management: the gap between 6.4% and 16.2% illustrates how endpoint analysis obscures the emotional and capital-management challenges of living through the trough. Second, decision cadence: 11 touchpoints across two months demand participants practice conviction calibration—knowing when to hold, reduce, or rotate. Third, psychological resilience: enduring paper losses that ultimately partially recover tests the discipline that separates measured response from panic. The 1980s correction offers a timeless laboratory for these lessons.
Featured in the archive