SET Uptrend Replay (1996-07-01 to 1997-07-01)
Replay Thailand's SET index as it climbed 78.2% from 640.75 to 1141.8 across 30 daily bars of historical uptrend. Step through each trading day, navigate 7 decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your reasoning in a simulated, educational environment.
30 daily bars · 7 decision points · 1996-02 to 1998-07 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 881 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 5.7% and a 80.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −5.7%
- Max run-up
- +80.0%
- Duration
- 881 days
- Largest single-day move
- +7.9%
- Bars
- 30 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 7
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Thailand's SET index represented one of the most compelling equity stories of the 1990s, charting an extraordinary 78.2% ascent that drew global capital into Southeast Asian markets. This scenario immerses participants in 30 daily bars of authentic uptrend data, presenting 7 decision points—3 of them critical—where timing and conviction were tested. The challenge was to capture directional momentum while navigating the psychological pressures inherent in any sustained advance.
The index climbed from 640.75 to 1141.8, delivering that substantial 78.2% return across the data span. Yet the journey was far from linear: a maximum drawdown of 5.7% tested conviction at various intervals, while the largest single-bar move of 7.9% introduced moments of acute uncertainty. These figures illustrate how even strong trending markets punish indecision and reward disciplined position management.
For decision training purposes, this scenario excels at revealing process gaps. Participants must navigate pullbacks of 5.7% without abandoning sound analysis, resist the urge to chase 7.9% single-bar surges, and make calibrated choices at each of the 7 decision points. The critical ones expose how psychological biases distort judgment during volatility. This replay ultimately teaches that navigating trends demands a repeatable framework, emotional equilibrium, and risk awareness—not prediction accuracy.
Featured in the archive