Default · DAX Index (2011)
Replay 144 turbulent days of the 2011 DAX, a German blue-chip index that plunged 19.0% as Greek debt fears reignited across Europe. You will move bar-by-bar, navigate 25 policy-driven decision points including 9 critical ones, and receive an AI coach review after each move in a simulated, educational setting.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2011-06 to 2011-12 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 202 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 32.1% and a 25.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −32.1%
- Max run-up
- +25.1%
- Duration
- 202 days
- Largest single-day move
- −5.8%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In mid-2011, the DAX stood at the center of European blue-chip equity markets as the sovereign debt crisis that had destabilized Greece began to reignite fears across the continent. German industrial giants, financial institutions, and export-dependent companies faced mounting uncertainty as policymakers in Athens, Brussels, and Berlin debated responses to mounting sovereign stress. The period carried significant systemic stakes, as interconnected European banking systems and the broader eurozone recovery hung in the balance.
From its opening close of 7217.43 on June 1, the DAX retreated to 5847.03 by December 20, delivering a cumulative loss of -19.0% over the 144 daily bars of this era. The journey proved treacherous, with peak-to-trough decline reaching 32.1% and the largest single-bar move touching 5.8%, underscoring the volatility that characterized every decision point.
This replay places participants at 25 distinct decision moments, 9 of which are classified as critical, requiring them to navigate bar-by-bar through a period defined by policy uncertainty and fear. The scenario tests risk management discipline, emotional regulation under drawdown pressure, and the ability to process rapidly evolving macroeconomic signals without succumbing to panic or complacency. For educational purposes, it demonstrates how systemic crises demand both analytical rigor and psychological resilience.