CSI 300 Downtrend Replay (2014-04-10 to 2014-05-19)
Replay a 52-bar CSI 300 correction spanning 2014-03-20 to 2014-06-05, featuring a 7.0% max drawdown. Decide day by day across 9 decision points, navigate 3 critical moments, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
52 daily bars · 9 decision points · 2014-03 to 2014-06 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 77 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 7.0% and a 9.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −7.0%
- Max run-up
- +9.1%
- Duration
- 77 days
- Largest single-day move
- +3.8%
- Bars
- 52 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 9
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In the spring of 2014, the CSI 300 entered a correction phase that challenged equity investors navigating one of the more uncertain stretches of the decade's early years. This replay covers 52 trading days from March 20 to June 5, 2014, placing participants directly in the market's daily rhythm as sentiment shifted and directional conviction was tested. For anyone managing positions through this period, the stakes were clear: preserve capital while recognizing whether the underlying trend remained intact or had fundamentally changed.
The index ultimately rose from 2.08 to 2.15, a 3.4% net gain that tells only part of the story. Beneath that modest advance lay a 7.0% maximum drawdown that tested portfolio resilience, while the largest single-day move of 3.8% revealed how quickly sentiment could reverse. Participants faced nine decision points across three critical junctures where choices about entry, exit, and risk exposure shaped outcomes. This historical window illustrates how apparent simplicity in final returns can mask substantial intraperiod turbulence that demands disciplined position management.
This correction scenario trains participants to distinguish between temporary price noise and genuine trend changes. The 7.0% drawdown provides a concrete reference point for examining drawdown tolerance, sizing decisions, and the psychological discipline needed to maintain conviction through adverse stretches. Navigating nine decision points—especially the three critical moments—develops the metacognitive skill of recognizing when conditions warrant defensive action versus patient endurance. The educational value lies not in predicting the next correction, but in building the systematic approach and emotional equilibrium necessary to respond effectively when uncertainty resurfaces.