Skip to main content

BIST 100 Downtrend Replay (2014-07-25 to 2014-08-15)

StocksBIST 100TRCorrection2014-07 to 2014-08Difficulty 1/5FreeView charts

Replay 30 daily bars from 2014-07-14 to 2014-08-27 capturing an 8.9% drawdown in the BIST 100 correction. Step through each session, face 7 decision points (3 critical), and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.

30K lines
7Decision points
1Difficulty
DailyGranularity

30 daily bars · 7 decision points · 2014-07 to 2014-08 · Stocks

Key facts

This window spans 44 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 8.9% and a 5.3% run-up.

Max drawdown
−8.9%
Max run-up
+5.3%
Duration
44 days
Largest single-day move
+2.5%
Bars
30 Daily bars
Decision points
7

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

In July 2014, Turkey's BIST 100 entered a phase of heightened uncertainty. This replay covers 30 trading days from July 14 to August 27, placing participants directly inside the correction as it unfolded. The central challenge was clear: distinguish temporary weakness from structural breakdown while protecting portfolio value from an index that was clearly under pressure.

The index closed at 804.67, nearly matching the opening of 806.22 for a net change of -0.2%. Yet this modest headline figure conceals an 8.9% maximum drawdown experienced during the period, with the largest single session move reaching 2.5%. Those 30 daily bars tell a story of grinding volatility rather than a single dramatic collapse.

Seven decision points pepper this replay, three marked as critical junctures where directional conviction truly mattered. Participants must confront position sizing under uncertainty, the temptation to average down into a falling market, and the psychological difficulty of holding discipline when drawdowns mount. This scenario teaches that survival in a correction is less about calling the bottom and more about process: defined exits, appropriate risk per trade, and emotional neutrality when the tape turns hostile.