Skip to main content

TA-35 Uptrend Replay (2016-06-27 to 2016-08-09)

StocksTA-35ILRally2016-06 to 2016-08Difficulty 1/5FreeView charts

Replay a 2016 Israeli TA-35 uptrend across 52 daily bars, featuring a 4.5% drawdown amid a measured 0.6% net advance. Users step through each session, make calls at 9 decision points, then receive an AI coach review of their simulated reasoning.

52K lines
9Decision points
1Difficulty
DailyGranularity

52 daily bars · 9 decision points · 2016-06 to 2016-08 · Stocks

Key facts

This window spans 90 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 4.5% and a 6.6% run-up.

Max drawdown
−4.5%
Max run-up
+6.6%
Duration
90 days
Largest single-day move
−3.5%
Bars
52 Daily bars
Decision points
9

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

The Israeli TA-35 index presented traders with a challenging 2016 uptrend across 52 daily bars, spanning from early June to late August within the 2010s decade. The market appeared poised for gains yet concealed meaningful volatility beneath the surface. Participants entering this scenario faced a classic test: sustaining conviction through an environment where the ultimate outcome remained uncertain until the final bars closed.

Price action confirmed a measured advance, closing at 1448.84 versus an opening of 1440.45, representing a mere 0.6% net gain. Yet this paltry result masked a turbulent journey featuring a 4.5% maximum drawdown and a 3.5% single-bar spike. Nine decision points punctuated the replay, three deemed critical, demanding that participants navigate momentum shifts and volatility spikes without the benefit of hindsight.

This scenario excels as a decision-training exercise precisely because the outcome rewards patience over heroism. The disparity between the 4.5% drawdown and 0.6% final gain teaches that staying invested through discomfort often matters more than market calls themselves. Participants learn to distinguish between process errors and acceptable volatility, developing the emotional resilience required when favorable positions temporarily turn against them.