TA-35 Downtrend Replay (1999-06-21 to 1999-08-10)
Replay a 58-bar Israeli TA-35 correction from summer 1999, navigating a 13.2% drawdown with daily decision points. You step through each historical session, make your own calls at 11 key moments, then receive an AI coach review of your simulated performance.
58 daily bars · 11 decision points · 1999-05 to 1999-09 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 100 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 13.2% and a 11.5% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −13.2%
- Max run-up
- +11.5%
- Duration
- 100 days
- Largest single-day move
- −3.2%
- Bars
- 58 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In the summer of 1999, Israeli equities faced a challenging correction period. The TA-35 index, representing the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange's 35 largest companies, entered a downward phase that tested the resolve of investors navigating uncertain markets. This 58-bar historical replay, spanning from May 25 to September 2, 1999, places participants directly into that volatile environment where portfolio decisions carried real consequences.
The headline number masks the turbulence beneath: while the index ultimately closed at 382.21, down just -1.6% from its 388.35 starting point, the journey was far bumpier. The maximum drawdown reached 13.2%, meaning peak-to-trough losses significantly exceeded the final percentage change. The largest single session moved 3.2%, illustrating the sharp daily swings that characterized this correction. Eleven decision points were embedded throughout this historical period, with four marked as critical junctures where directional conviction would be tested.
This replay is designed to sharpen decision-making under pressure. Navigating a 13.2% drawdown without panicking requires discipline in position sizing, clear pre-defined exit strategies, and the emotional regulation to avoid selling at the worst moment. Participants learn to distinguish between signal and noise, respecting volatility while maintaining their analytical framework. The psychological dimension is equally important: enduring a double-digit drawdown tests conviction, and this historical scenario provides a safe sandbox to build that resilience before facing real markets.