Policy · Shenzhen Component Index (2015)
A four-ministry policy push triggered a 48.7% drawdown in the Shenzhen Component Index across 144 trading days. Replay each session, navigate 25 decision points, and receive AI coach feedback in this simulated market-training scenario.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2015-04 to 2015-11 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 212 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 48.7% and a 36.7% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −48.7%
- Max run-up
- +36.7%
- Duration
- 212 days
- Largest single-day move
- −8.2%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In the spring of 2015, China's Shenzhen Component Index entered one of its most turbulent periods on record. A sweeping policy initiative by four central ministries encouraging share buybacks aimed to stabilize markets and restore confidence. Over the months that followed, this policy push would collide with forces far larger than any regulatory gesture could contain, placing investors and decision-makers in an extraordinarily complex environment.
The index descended from 14749.13 to 12702.03, a nominal decline of 13.9% across 144 trading days. Yet that headline figure concealed a far more violent underlying story: the maximum drawdown reached 48.7%, with a single session delivering an 8.2% swing. Navigating this landscape required facing 25 decision points, of which 9 were deemed critical. Every entry, exit, and hold carried consequences that compounded across the period.
This replay demands confronting the limits of policy as a market stabilizer and the psychological strain of operating under deep uncertainty. Participants must grapple with position sizing, risk management, and the discipline required to avoid reactive decisions when volatility spikes to levels that test every framework. The scenario strips away hindsight, asking instead how process and judgment perform when the future remains genuinely unknowable.