Skip to main content

Boom · Shenzhen Component Index (2006)

StocksSZSE ComponentCNPolicy2006-02 to 2006-09Difficulty 3/5FreeView charts

Replay 150 daily bars from the Shenzhen Component Index between 2006-02-13 and 2006-09-15, a stretch where the close climbed 26.5%. You step through each session, weigh 26 decision points, and receive an AI coach review of simulated choices.

150K lines
26Decision points
3Difficulty
DailyGranularity

150 daily bars · 26 decision points · 2006-02 to 2006-09 · Stocks

Key facts

This window spans 214 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 14.1% and a 38.1% run-up.

Max drawdown
−14.1%
Max run-up
+38.1%
Duration
214 days
Largest single-day move
−4.7%
Bars
150 Daily bars
Decision points
26

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

In early 2006 the Shenzhen Component Index was navigating one of the most consequential policy shifts in Chinese equity market history. With the index trading around 3307.7, investors faced a landscape defined by reform momentum and lingering uncertainty about whether growth could be sustained. The SZSE was a proxy for questions that mattered not just to traders but to the broader economy: would policy support translate into lasting structural strength, or would speculative excess derail the recovery?

From February 13 to September 15, 2006, the close climbed 26.5% to 4183.76 across 150 daily bars. The advance was not smooth—a max drawdown of 14.1% reminded participants that momentum can reverse sharply. The largest single-bar move of 4.7% punctuated the period, illustrating how policy signals could jolt prices in either direction. These numbers define a market that rewarded conviction but punished complacency.

This scenario distills 26 decision points, 9 of them critical, into a training ground for process and psychology. Participants must navigate shifting sentiment without the benefit of hindsight, practicing disciplined risk management in the face of a 14.1% peak-to-trough exposure. The lesson is not about predicting the next breakout but about building a repeatable framework that holds under volatility—a mindset as valuable in 2006 as it is today.