Collapse · Straits Times Index (2018)
Replay the Straits Times Index from 3,245.34 to 3,195.87 across 144 daily bars, navigating a 9.2% drawdown. Step into 25 decision points, defend your choices under AI coach review, and learn from simulated, educational market history.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2018-08 to 2019-03 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 207 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 9.2% and a 10.5% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −9.2%
- Max run-up
- +10.5%
- Duration
- 207 days
- Largest single-day move
- −2.7%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The Straits Times Index entered a turbulent five-month replay period spanning from August 2018 to March 2019, encompassing 144 daily bars of authentic market data. This era coincided with heightened global trade tensions, shifting monetary policy expectations, and regional economic uncertainty that tested investor conviction across Southeast Asian markets. Participants entering this replay faced the challenge of navigating a market where policy headlines could shift sentiment rapidly, requiring disciplined analysis under incomplete information.
Against this backdrop, the index closed the period at 3195.87, a modest -1.5% decline from the opening 3245.34. However, the headline number obscures the journey: a maximum drawdown of 9.2% tested portfolio endurance, while the largest single-bar move of 2.7% demonstrated how sudden sentiment shifts could strike without warning. Across the 25 decision points embedded in this replay, with 9 flagged as critical, participants confronted moments where conviction and risk management diverged sharply.
This replay distills three enduring lessons for decision training. First, process discipline matters more than outcome correlation; staying methodologically consistent through volatility builds transferable skill. Second, drawdown awareness reshapes position sizing and emotional tolerance, making the 9.2% peak-to-trough experience a practical risk calibration exercise. Third, critical decision points reveal psychological vulnerabilities—hesitation, overconfidence, or reactive selling—that only deliberate practice in simulated conditions can expose and refine.