Policy · Shanghai Composite Index (2015)
Replay 144 daily bars on the Shanghai Composite from April to November 2015, when the index fell 17.5% amid policy-driven volatility and a 43.3% drawdown. Step through 25 decision points with simulated capital and receive an AI coach review.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2015-04 to 2015-11 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 212 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 43.3% and a 25.6% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −43.3%
- Max run-up
- +25.6%
- Duration
- 212 days
- Largest single-day move
- −8.5%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In April 2015, the Shanghai Composite Index entered a turbulent phase as policy signals from multiple government ministries shaped market expectations. The period from April 22 to November 20, 2015, saw the intersection of regulatory initiatives—most notably the four-ministry encouragement of corporate buybacks to stabilize markets—and underlying equity volatility. This era presented participants with a complex environment where policy-driven events could rapidly shift market dynamics.
The index declined from 4398.49 to 3630.5, a total retreat of 17.5%. The journey proved far more volatile than the headline figure suggests, as the market experienced a maximum drawdown of 43.3% and the largest single daily move reached 8.5%. Across 144 trading days, participants faced 25 decision points, nine of which were classified as critical—moments where positioning and risk management carried heightened consequence.
This replay sharpens decision-making under conditions of policy-induced uncertainty. Trainees learn to separate signal from noise when ministries speak, manage exposure during periods of outsized daily swings, and maintain disciplined process when drawdowns approach historic levels. The psychological dimension—staying objective when headlines shift sentiment—proves as important as any technical framework.