War · Shanghai Composite Index (2014)
Replay 144 daily bars of the Shanghai Composite from October 2013 to May 2014, with the index sliding 3.9% amid Crimea-driven volatility. Walk through 25 decision points, nine of them critical, and get an AI coach review on every choice you make.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2013-10 to 2014-05 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 212 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 11.6% and a 7.8% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −11.6%
- Max run-up
- +7.8%
- Duration
- 212 days
- Largest single-day move
- +2.9%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In the autumn of 2013, the Shanghai Composite Index sat at 2133.87 as global markets braced for an unfolding geopolitical drama. The Crimea crisis was igniting tensions between Russia and the West, sending shockwaves through international financial markets. For Chinese equity investors, this period represented a test of how far-away political fires could scorch domestic portfolios. The stage was set for a seven-month replay that would challenge even seasoned market participants.
Over 144 daily bars from October 2013 to May 2014, the index drifted to 2050.23, a decline of -3.9%. Beneath that modest headline number lay considerable turbulence: a maximum drawdown of 11.6% tested portfolio resilience, while the largest single-bar move of 2.9% reminded participants that volatility arrives without warning. Navigating this landscape demanded decisions at 25 distinct points, nine of them critical junctures where direction proved most uncertain.
This replay teaches that geopolitical risks rarely announce their market impact in advance. Process matters more than prediction: adhering to disciplined risk management when drawdowns approach double digits separates skilled participants from reactive ones. The psychology of holding through uncertainty—knowing when to adapt and when to maintain conviction—proves as vital as any analytical framework. For decision trainers, Crimea offers a classroom where volatility, risk, and composure converge daily.