Inflation · Shanghai Composite Index (2011)
Replay 144 daily bars on the Shanghai Composite Index from March to October 2011 as the index slid from 2933.8 to 2420, a 17.5% decline. Make your own calls at 25 decision points and receive an AI coach review of simulated trades.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2011-03 to 2011-10 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 215 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 23.3% and a 7.6% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −23.3%
- Max run-up
- +7.6%
- Duration
- 215 days
- Largest single-day move
- −3.8%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In early 2011, China's economy faced a delicate balancing act: inflation pressures were mounting while monetary authorities signaled tightening policies. The Shanghai Composite Index hovered near 2933.8 as investors tried to gauge whether consumer prices had peaked or would climb further. This replay scenario places you in the heart of that uncertainty, with 25 decision points to navigate across 144 trading days as the market's direction became increasingly clear.
What followed was a sustained decline. The index fell 17.5% from its March opening to close at 2420 by October, experiencing a maximum drawdown of 23.3%. Volatility was a constant companion, with single sessions moving as much as 3.8%, testing the resolve of any participant. Nine critical moments separated mere fluctuations from decisive turning points, demanding consistent strategic thinking rather than reactive trading.
This scenario excels as a decision-training exercise precisely because the environment offered no clear winners. Managing risk through a 23.3% drawdown requires discipline and defined processes. The psychological dimension is equally demanding: staying rational when every bar reinforces a downtrend, or recognizing when volatility itself becomes the signal. Participants learn that outcome in an inflationary-policy environment depends less on predicting CPI peaks than on executing a repeatable process that survives drawdowns and capitalizes on the 3.8% moves that punctuate even the most frustrating markets.