Skip to main content

S&P 400 MidCap Uptrend Replay (1988-08-15 to 1988-10-21)

StocksS&P MidCap 400USRally1988-07 to 1988-11Difficulty 1/5FreeView charts

Replay a 1988 S&P 400 MidCap segment spanning 98 daily bars through a 6.2% drawdown. Step through each day, face 11 decision points including 4 critical junctures, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.

98K lines
11Decision points
1Difficulty
DailyGranularity

98 daily bars · 11 decision points · 1988-07 to 1988-11 · Stocks

Key facts

This window spans 137 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 6.2% and a 7.3% run-up.

Max drawdown
−6.2%
Max run-up
+7.3%
Duration
137 days
Largest single-day move
−1.7%
Bars
98 Daily bars
Decision points
11

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

The S&P 400 MidCap index during mid-1988 presented investors with a nuanced challenge in the mid-cap space. This historical replay covers the period from August 15 to October 21, 1988, a span that captured shifting sentiment in a market segment often overlooked during the larger-cap rallies of the era. The 98 daily bars represent authentic market rhythm that tested both directional conviction and risk discipline.

The index closed the period at 78.59, down 4.7% from 82.43, with a maximum drawdown of 6.2% and single-bar volatility peaking at 1.7%. Eleven decision points punctuated this stretch—four labeled critical—demanding participants navigate uncertainty with precision timing and position management.

This replay reveals why disciplined process matters more than directional accuracy. The 6.2% drawdown tested risk frameworks under sustained pressure across 98 daily bars, while the modest 1.7% largest move challenged participants to avoid overreaction to perceived signals. The four critical junctures became stress tests for emotional control and sizing conviction, teaching that surviving range-bound declines requires capital preservation discipline even when losses appear contained.