Skip to main content

Regulation · Nifty 50 Index (2015)

StocksNifty 50INPolicy2015-07 to 2016-02Difficulty 3/5FreeView charts

Replay 144 turbulent days as Indian markets absorbed new insider-trading and merger rules, with the index shedding 16.2%. Step through each session, tackle 25 decision points, and receive an AI coach review in a simulated, educational setting.

144K lines
25Decision points
3Difficulty
DailyGranularity

144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2015-07 to 2016-02 · Stocks

Key facts

This window spans 215 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 19.2% and a 9.7% run-up.

Max drawdown
−19.2%
Max run-up
+9.7%
Duration
215 days
Largest single-day move
−5.9%
Bars
144 Daily bars
Decision points
25

Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology

How to play
  1. The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.

  2. At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.

  3. After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.

Event Replay

What happened — and what it teaches

The Nifty 50 Index entered a turbulent seven-month stretch from July 2015 through February 2016, as Indian markets grappled with strengthened insider-trading and merger regulations. This period represented a pivotal test for traders and investors navigating a landscape reshaped by tighter compliance frameworks. The 2010s decade was witnessing a global push for greater market transparency, and India was no exception.

Over 144 daily bars, the index declined from 8633.5 to 7234.55, a drop of -16.2%. The maximum drawdown reached 19.2%, with the largest single session swing hitting 5.9%. Participants faced 25 decision points throughout the replay, nine of which were critical junctures that demanded careful risk assessment and disciplined execution.

This scenario sharpens decision-making by immersing learners in a sustained downtrend punctuated by sharp reversals. Trainees must manage position sizing against a 19.2% drawdown environment, practice emotional control when facing a 5.9% intraday shock, and refine their process for acting on regulatory cues. The educational value lies in building psychological resilience and a systematic approach to uncertainty—skills that transfer far beyond this specific historical episode.