Canada National (BIS) Historical Replay: 1996-01 to 2003-04
Replay Canada's BIS property market from January 1996 to April 2003 across 30 monthly bars as it rose 37.6%. You navigate six decision points, two of them critical, with AI coach feedback in a simulated training environment.
30 monthly bars · 6 decision points · 1996-01 to 2003-04 · Property
Key facts
Peak-to-trough drawdown of 3.9% with a 37.6% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −3.9%
- Max run-up
- +37.6%
- Largest single-month move
- +4.4%
- Bars
- 30 Monthly bars
- Decision points
- 6
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Canada's BIS property market from January 1996 to April 2003 represents a decade-spanning recovery that crossed two distinct economic eras. Investors entering this period faced a market emerging from uncertainty into sustained growth, with interest rates, employment, and consumer confidence all in flux across the 1990s and 2000s. The stakes were clear: recognizing when to build positions during recovery and when to trust the trend.
Over 30 monthly bars, the market climbed from 44.91 to 61.78, delivering a 37.6% total return. Yet this aggregate figure conceals turbulence—a maximum drawdown of 3.9% tested conviction at various points, and a largest single-bar move of 4.4% demanded disciplined risk management. Six decision points punctuated the journey, two of them critical moments where positioning decisions shaped outcomes.
This replay trains participants to hold conviction through measured drawdowns while respecting volatility that can erase gains in a single session. The 4.4% single-bar shock demonstrates why position sizing matters even in trending markets. The critical decision points force learners to confront whether they are reacting to noise or responding to genuine structural shifts. Success requires balancing patience with prudence, understanding that the 37.6% gain only materialized for those who navigated uncertainty without abandoning their process.