MSCI ACWI Uptrend Replay (2012-06-01 to 2012-09-14)
Replay 148 trading days of the MSCI ACWI from April to November 2012, when global equities drifted just 0.6% from 45.98 to 46.25. Walk through 11 decision points day-by-day, face critical risk calls, and receive AI coach feedback in this simulated training environment.
148 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2012-04 to 2012-11 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 212 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 12.0% and a 16.5% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −12.0%
- Max run-up
- +16.5%
- Duration
- 212 days
- Largest single-day move
- −3.9%
- Bars
- 148 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- MSCI ACWI Uptrend Replay (2014-02-03 to 2014-06-20)2013 · Lv.2
- MSCI ACWI Uptrend Replay (2013-06-24 to 2013-12-31)2013 · Lv.2
- MSCI ACWI Uptrend Replay (2011-12-19 to 2012-04-02)2011 · Lv.1
- MSCI ACWI Uptrend Replay (2011-03-16 to 2011-04-29)2011 · Lv.1
- MSCI ACWI Uptrend Replay (2015-01-06 to 2015-05-21)2014 · Lv.1
- MSCI ACWI Uptrend Replay (2014-10-16 to 2014-11-26)2014 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The MSCI ACWI captures the pulse of global equities across developed and emerging markets, making it a natural stage for studying broad market behavior. This replay covers 148 trading days from April 9 to November 7, 2012—a period bookended by the tail end of European debt anxieties and the anticipation of Federal Reserve stimulus. Participants entered an environment where macroeconomic signals were mixed, central bank intentions unclear, and the direction of global risk appetite genuinely uncertain.
The headline result looks tame: the index closed at 46.25, up just 0.6% from its starting level of 45.98. Yet this flat appearance conceals meaningful turbulence. During the 148 daily bars, the index suffered a maximum drawdown of 12.0%, and individual sessions recorded moves as large as 3.9%. The gap between headline stability and underlying volatility is precisely what makes this scenario instructive.
This replay trains participants to look beneath surface calm for hidden risk. With 11 decision points—4 flagged as critical—learners must navigate periods of directional ambiguity, manage exposure when momentum is unclear, and resist the temptation to confuse sideways price action with low risk. The experience reinforces that disciplined process, not short-term P&L, defines sound market judgment.
Featured in the archive