Merval Uptrend Replay (2011-03-16 to 2011-04-04)
Replay 30 daily bars of Argentina's Merval from 2011-02-28 to 2011-04-14, navigating an 8.0% drawdown with 2.8% single-bar swings. Step through seven decision points, face three critical calls, and receive an AI coach review after each simulated trading day.
30 daily bars · 7 decision points · 2011-02 to 2011-04 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 45 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 8.0% and a 9.8% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −8.0%
- Max run-up
- +9.8%
- Duration
- 45 days
- Largest single-day move
- −2.8%
- Bars
- 30 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 7
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
Argentina's Merval index in early 2011 represented one of Latin America's most volatile equity arenas. The replay covers the 2010s decade, spanning late February to mid-April, a period when commodity-linked sectors and domestic political dynamics created an unpredictable environment. Navigating this market demanded disciplined risk management and the capacity to process conflicting signals under pressure.
The replay presents 30 daily bars from 2011-02-28 to 2011-04-14. Despite the headline focus on the 2011-03-16 to 2011-04-04 rally window, the overall session delivered a modest retreat, with the close declining from 3456 to 3382, a -2.1% outcome. The market tested resolve with an 8.0% maximum drawdown while intraday volatility spiked to 2.8% in single sessions—not a collapse, but enough to punish overleveraged positions or shake conviction.
Seven decision points structure this replay, with three marked as critical calls that could define outcomes. The scenario illustrates that navigating volatility requires more than technical analysis. Process discipline, risk calibration, and emotional resilience become paramount when facing drawdowns. This replay trains participants to recognize that surviving sharp reversals is not about prediction but about systematic response under uncertainty.