KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2017-08-11 to 2017-11-01)
Replay a 102-bar KOSPI 200 uptrend from July to December 2017, where the index climbed 3.7% from 31325 to 32490. Step through each trading day, tackle decision points, and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
102 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2017-07 to 2017-12 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 153 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 6.3% and a 12.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −6.3%
- Max run-up
- +12.0%
- Duration
- 153 days
- Largest single-day move
- −2.3%
- Bars
- 102 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2017-12-21 to 2018-01-29)2017 · Lv.1
- KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2019-01-03 to 2019-04-16)2018 · Lv.1
- KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2016-01-21 to 2016-04-21)2015 · Lv.1
- KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2019-05-29 to 2019-06-27)2019 · Lv.1
- KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2014-10-17 to 2015-04-23)2014 · Lv.1
- KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2014-02-04 to 2014-07-30)2014 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The KOSPI 200, South Korea's benchmark large-cap equity index, faced a pivotal window during the second half of 2017. As the 2010s market matured, investors navigated an environment where optimism about global growth collided with regional geopolitical undercurrents. This 102-bar replay spans July 6 to December 6, 2017, placing traders in the daily rhythm of decisions that shaped port folio outcomes.
The index rose 3.7% over the period, moving from 31325 to 32490. This headline number conceals a more textured reality: a maximum drawdown of 6.3% tested conviction, while a largest single-bar move of 2.3% occasionally forced rapid reassessment. Across 102 trading days, participants confronted 11 decision points, with 4 deemed critical to the trajectory.
This replay sharpens decision-making under ambiguity. Participants must process information sequentially, manage exposure during the 6.3% drawdown, and decide how to respond when volatility spikes by 2.3% in a single day. The 4 critical decision points demand evaluation of whether to hold, adjust, or step aside. AI coach review reveals gaps between intention and process, building discipline that transfers beyond this specific historical window.