KOSPI 200 Downtrend Replay (2014-07-30 to 2014-10-17)
Replay a KOSPI 200 downtrend spanning 104 daily bars from June to November 2014, with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 11.6%. Step through each session, face 11 decision points (4 critical), and receive an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
104 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2014-06 to 2014-11 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 151 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 11.6% and a 5.8% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −11.6%
- Max run-up
- +5.8%
- Duration
- 151 days
- Largest single-day move
- +1.8%
- Bars
- 104 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- KOSPI 200 Downtrend Replay (2015-04-23 to 2015-08-24)2015 · Lv.1
- KOSPI 200 Downtrend Replay (2013-02-20 to 2013-06-26)2013 · Lv.2
- KOSPI 200 Downtrend Replay (2011-07-07 to 2011-08-12)2011 · Lv.3
- KOSPI 200 Downtrend Replay (2018-03-15 to 2018-10-29)2018 · Lv.3
- KOSPI 200 Downtrend Replay (2011-05-31 to 2011-06-20)2011 · Lv.1
- S&P/BMV IPC Downtrend Replay (2014-11-03 to 2014-12-16)2014 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The KOSPI 200 entered a correction phase in mid-2014, testing the resilience of traders who had grown accustomed to a relatively stable post-crisis environment. This replay spans 104 daily bars from late June through mid-November 2014, capturing a peak-to-trough decline that would challenge both systematic strategies and discretionary judgment. With 11 decision points woven through the dataset—including 4 critical junctures where positioning decisions carried heightened consequence—participants navigate a period where directional conviction alone was insufficient protection.
The index closed the period at 24965, down 2.7% from an opening reference near 25645. However, the headline percentage understates the journey: the maximum drawdown reached 11.6%, meaning positions entered near local highs experienced substantial interim stress. The largest single-day swing of 1.8% added urgency to risk-management calls, demanding that participants either sized positions conservatively or maintained disciplined stop protocols to survive volatility spikes within the broader correction.
This replay distills lessons in process discipline, risk calibration, and emotional regulation. Participants learn that surviving a double-digit drawdown requires more than directional accuracy—it demands position sizing that preserves capital through adverse stretches, clear pre-defined exit criteria that prevent averaging into losses, and psychological acceptance that drawdowns are inevitable even in historically manageable corrections. The 2014 KOSPI 200 episode serves as a controlled laboratory for practicing these skills without real-world financial consequences.