KOSPI 200 Uptrend Replay (2011-12-19 to 2012-04-03)
Replay 146 daily bars of KOSPI 200 from 2011-10-27 to 2012-05-25, where the index slipped from 25300 to 24325 despite a 14.1% drawdown along the way. Step through 11 decision points and receive AI coach review in a simulated, educational environment.
146 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2011-10 to 2012-05 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 211 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 14.1% and a 18.7% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −14.1%
- Max run-up
- +18.7%
- Duration
- 211 days
- Largest single-day move
- −4.8%
- Bars
- 146 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The KOSPI 200 entered the replay window in late October 2011 with European sovereign debt fears reverberating through global markets. This 146-bar daily dataset, spanning 2011-10-27 to 2012-05-25, captures a market caught between recovery hopes and persistent uncertainty. Participants face an index that would test the resolve of any investor, navigating a landscape where the prevailing narrative shifted almost weekly. The stage is set for 11 decision points—4 flagged as critical—demanding disciplined responses to evolving conditions.
The index closed this period at 24325, having opened at 25300, representing a net decline of 3.9%. Yet the journey proved far more turbulent than the headline number suggests: a maximum drawdown of 14.1% tested portfolio values at their lows, while the largest single session swing of 4.8% could have shaken even well-prepared participants. These figures underscore the difference between point-to-point returns and the lived experience of holding through volatility. The market did not fall in a straight line; it oscillated, recovered partially, and tested lows repeatedly, creating multiple scenarios where decisions had to be made without the benefit of hindsight.
This replay is ultimately a study in process over prediction. A 14.1% drawdown forces the question: how much risk is acceptable before conviction becomes stubbornness? The 4.8% intraday spikes remind us that panic and euphoria can strike within a single session. With 4 critical decision points embedded in the timeline, participants must practice separating signal from noise, avoiding the trap of recency bias that makes after-the-fact clarity feel like foresight. The goal is not to predict the next move but to build the habits that make any outcome survivable.