Crisis · KOSPI Index (2015)
KOSPI fell 6.1% across 144 trading days from April to November 2015, plunging through a 14.8% drawdown. Replay each session on FinFable, face 25 decision points, and get an AI coach review of your simulated choices.
144 daily bars · 25 decision points · 2015-04 to 2015-11 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 210 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 14.8% and a 12.2% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −14.8%
- Max run-up
- +12.2%
- Duration
- 210 days
- Largest single-day move
- +3.0%
- Bars
- 144 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 25
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Bubble · KOSPI Index (2015)2015 · Lv.1
- War · KOSPI Index (2016)2015 · Lv.1
- Collapse · KOSPI Index (2015)2015 · Lv.1
- Pandemic · KOSPI Index (2015)2015 · Lv.1
- Pandemic · KOSPI Index (2015)2015 · Lv.1
- Pandemic · KOSPI Index (2015)2015 · Lv.1
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
By April 2015, the KOSPI index stood near historic highs, reflecting investor optimism across Asian markets. The period from late April to late November that year would test that confidence, as regional and global pressures converged on Korean equities. This 144-trading-day window became a case study in navigating sustained uncertainty and policy-driven volatility.
The index slipped from 2147.67 to 2016.29, a decline of -6.1% across the era. The journey was far from linear—investors endured a maximum drawdown of 14.8% as sentiment shifted repeatedly. The most volatile sessions produced single-day moves of 3.0%, creating 25 distinct decision points, of which 9 proved critical to outcomes. Each bar represented a moment where positioning and risk management mattered.
Replay this scenario on FinFable to experience the pressure of those inflection points. The episode teaches that volatility itself is not the enemy—poor preparation and reactive decision-making are. Disciplined risk management, clear position sizing, and emotional equilibrium distinguish those who survive drawdowns from those who capitulate. Study the tape, make your choices, and learn what separates informed process from guesswork.