Inflation · KOSPI Index (2011)
Across 150 daily bars from April to November 2011, the KOSPI fell from 2121.92 to 1839.17. Replay each session, navigate 26 decision points, and receive an AI coach review in this simulated, educational market scenario.
150 daily bars · 26 decision points · 2011-04 to 2011-11 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 219 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 25.9% and a 16.7% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −25.9%
- Max run-up
- +16.7%
- Duration
- 219 days
- Largest single-day move
- −6.2%
- Bars
- 150 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 26
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In spring 2011, South Korea's KOSPI index stood at 2121.92, confronting an environment where global inflationary pressures had become persistent. Central banks worldwide were navigating the delicate balance between supporting recovery and taming rising prices. For traders and investors, the period represented a test of conviction: would corporate earnings hold up as input costs climbed, and how would monetary policy respond?
The seven months that followed delivered a harsh verdict. By November 18, 2011, the KOSPI had retreated to 1839.17, a decline of -13.3%. The journey was more turbulent than the final number suggests, with a maximum drawdown of 25.9% and a largest single-bar move of 6.2%, underscoring moments of acute panic and reversal. Across 150 daily bars, participants faced 26 decision points, 9 of which proved critical to outcomes.
This replay teaches that volatility itself becomes an adversary when drawdowns exceed comfort zones. The process of managing risk during sustained declines, rather than predicting turning points, separates disciplined participants from reactive ones. Psychological resilience matters: surviving the largest single-bar moves without abandoning strategy is often what determines whether a portfolio emerges from challenging eras intact. Decision training in such environments sharpens judgment about position sizing, stops, and the emotional discipline required when the trend runs against you.