Commodity Shock · KOSPI Index (2008)
Replay the 2008 KOSPI slide from 1723.55 to 1490.25 across 150 daily bars of authentic market data. Step through 26 decision points, including 9 critical ones, and receive an AI coach review after each simulated trade.
150 daily bars · 26 decision points · 2008-01 to 2008-08 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 222 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 21.1% and a 20.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −21.1%
- Max run-up
- +20.0%
- Duration
- 222 days
- Largest single-day move
- −4.4%
- Bars
- 150 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 26
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- Boom · KOSPI Index (2009)2008 · Lv.4
- Commodity Shock · KOSPI Index (2008)2008 · Lv.4
- Commodity Shock · KOSPI Index (2008)2008 · Lv.4
- Collapse · KOSPI Index (2009)2008 · Lv.4
- Commodity Shock · KOSPI Index (2008)2008 · Lv.4
- Default · KOSPI Index (2008)2008 · Lv.5
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
In January 2008, the KOSPI index stood at 1723.55, reflecting investor confidence in South Korea's equity market amid global economic expansion. The period through August 2008 would test that confidence as commodity prices surged globally, creating inflationary pressures that forced central banks to tighten monetary policy. For traders and investors, this era represented a critical test of risk management under rising uncertainty.
The index declined to 1490.25 by late August, a -13.5% move across 150 daily bars. The journey was anything but smooth—the market experienced a maximum drawdown of 21.1%, with the largest single-day swing reaching 4.4%. Across the 150 trading days, 26 decision points emerged, including 9 critical moments where positioning decisions could significantly alter outcomes. This period demonstrates how headline declines can obscure the volatile interim price action that defines real market behavior.
For decision training, this scenario emphasizes process discipline over prediction. With a -13.5% headline loss but a 21.1% max drawdown, traders must confront the psychological challenge of managing positions through prolonged adversity. The 9 critical decision points highlight that market environments evolve, requiring traders to reassess risk-reward dynamically rather than clinging to static positions. Learning to navigate such volatility demands strict adherence to risk management principles and emotional resilience when markets move against expectations.
Featured in the archive