ISEQ Downtrend Replay (2011-07-04 to 2011-08-08)
Replay an authentic ISEQ crash from summer 2011, when the index fell 15.4% from 2921.55 to 2470.3 over 52 daily bars. Step through each decision point day-by-day, defend your choices, and receive an AI coach review in a simulated, educational environment.
52 daily bars · 9 decision points · 2011-06 to 2011-08 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 71 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 20.6% and a 7.1% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −20.6%
- Max run-up
- +7.1%
- Duration
- 71 days
- Largest single-day move
- −4.4%
- Bars
- 52 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 9
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The ISEQ index in summer 2011 confronted a challenging environment as European sovereign debt concerns escalated across the continent. The period from mid-June through late August placed investors in a sustained downtrend requiring careful assessment of deteriorating conditions and the resolve to act decisively when opportunities or risks emerged.
Over 52 daily bars spanning 2011-06-14 to 2011-08-24, the ISEQ fell 15.4% from 2921.55 to 2470.3. The index endured a maximum drawdown of 20.6%, while the largest single-bar move reached 4.4%. Nine decision points punctuated the decline, including three critical moments that demanded particularly careful judgment as momentum shifted and sentiment deteriorated.
This replay teaches the vital importance of process discipline when confronting extended market losses. Participants must examine their own decision frameworks, emotional responses, and position management strategies through a -15.4% drawdown scenario. The session strips away prediction and focuses on execution: did you act on defined rules, manage risk proportionally, and maintain psychological equilibrium when positions moved against you by 20.6%?