S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2011-09-22 to 2011-11-11)
Replay the S&P/BMV IPC's 9.3% climb from 33904.38 to 37054.56 across 72 daily bars of authentic 2011 trading. Make your own calls at 11 decision points, including 4 critical ones, then receive an AI coach review of every decision in this simulated educational exercise.
72 daily bars · 11 decision points · 2011-08 to 2011-12 · Stocks
Key facts
This window spans 104 days with a peak-to-trough drawdown of 9.4% and a 16.0% run-up.
- Max drawdown
- −9.4%
- Max run-up
- +16.0%
- Duration
- 104 days
- Largest single-day move
- −4.8%
- Bars
- 72 Daily bars
- Decision points
- 11
Every figure above is computed programmatically from this replay’s own candle series — no editorial input, no LLM. Methodology: Methodology
The market advances day by day. You only see candles up to the current day — as if you were really there.
At key decision points choose Buy / Trim / Exit / Hold. Each decision advances the timeline by one day.
After settlement you get a six-dimension score and an AI coach review. Your result enters the scenario leaderboard.
Related scenarios
- S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2011-11-25 to 2012-05-07)2011 · Lv.2
- S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2010-05-20 to 2010-06-21)2010 · Lv.1
- S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2010-01-29 to 2010-04-15)2009 · Lv.1
- S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2009-10-30 to 2010-01-07)2009 · Lv.2
- S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2015-01-30 to 2015-04-24)2014 · Lv.2
- S&P/BMV IPC Uptrend Replay (2008-03-10 to 2008-04-21)2008 · Lv.2
Event Replay
What happened — and what it teaches
The S&P/BMV IPC index presents a compelling case study for traders navigating emerging market dynamics during a period of heightened global uncertainty. Spanning from late August to early December 2011, this 72-day replay captures Mexican equities navigating a complex backdrop where investor sentiment shifted frequently between risk-on optimism and risk-off caution. Participants face 11 decision points—4 of them critical—requiring them to demonstrate both conviction and flexibility as conditions evolve.
The replay documents a 9.3% upward trajectory, with the index advancing from 33904.38 to 37054.56. However, this apparent straightforward climb contains instructive turbulence: a maximum drawdown of 9.4% tested conviction during pullbacks, while a single-session move of 4.8% demanded disciplined risk management. The journey was neither linear nor forgiving, rewarding those who maintained process over those simply chasing momentum.
This scenario excels as a decision-training vehicle because it captures the essence of real market participation—the tension between following a directional bias and respecting risk parameters. Traders must navigate the psychological challenge of holding positions through significant reversals without abandoning sound methodology. The replay's educational value lies in demonstrating how disciplined decision-making under uncertainty, rather than prediction accuracy, ultimately separates effective market participants from reactive ones.